and it was given us a number of 1495. and that is the maximum to build. >> you don't know how they arrived at that number. >> i don't know. >> okay. >> we will hear from them. >> thank you. >> mr. sutter are you handling this case? >> okay. >> excuse me president hwang and members of the board and i am with the department staff and just to rearticulate the issues on appeal right now. this case does not involve a lot line adjustment and subsequent construction of a new single family home on the resulting vacant lot. because of how the appellant has chosen to adjust that and configure the new lot, four separate variances are required from the planning code. three of those four were justified. and we granted them. those were variances for rear yard, parking and lot area requirements. the granting of each of those variances acknowledged the unusual geometry of the resulting lot. and allowed what we felt and continue to feel is the necessary flexibility to design a building that is responsive to the neighborhood and to the lot